Local Building Industry
Announces Results of Economic Impact Study
Norman
Builders Association
Norman
Developers Council
(Norman,
Okla.) For a long time local builders and developers have said they make
significant economic contributions to the growth of Norman—now they have the
numbers to back them up.
According
to Elliot Eisenberg, housing policy economist for the National Association of
Home Builders (NAHB), in 2004 Norman builders and developers generated nearly
$80 million in local income, $9 million in taxes and other revenue for local
governments, and 1,597 local jobs.
And that
is just in the first year of building 652 single-family homes and 200
multi-family homes. The annual recurring impacts on those same homes include
$20 million in local income, nearly $3 million in taxes and other revenue for
local governments, and 419 local jobs.
Eisenberg
recently presented the results at a luncheon attended by more than 70 city
officials and community leaders as part of a 2005 Economic Impact Study he conducted
for the NAHB.
“This
report captures what builders and developers have been saying for a long time…
we invest in our hometown,” said Steve Risser, president of the Norman Builders
Association. “New homes really do equal jobs, disposable income and more tax
revenue for local services.”
The
economic impact study was commissioned by the Norman Builders Association and
the Norman Developers Council to evaluate the effect of residential
construction activity on income, jobs and taxes generated locally. The data
included 652 single family homes and 200 multi-family units built in Norman but
took into account the economic effect on Canadian, Cleveland, Grady, Lincoln,
Logan, McClain and Oklahoma County.
“I was surprised
by the numbers,” said Trey Bates, chairman of the Norman Developers
Council. “As a developer you go about
your daily business working to create your own community within Norman. It is
amazing and validating to hear the financial impact that we, builders and
developers, have on our community as a whole.”
Seventy
percent of Norman’s general fund income is derived from sales taxes. Gross
receipts taxes paid to the city from construction and real estate activity
account for about $10.7 million in tax and other revenue for local governments,
not counting the trickle down effects, like homebuyers purchasing furniture or
subcontractors buying local supplies, which increase the fiscal impact of
growth on the city's coffers.
The
economic impact study also addressed the common misperception that “growth
doesn’t pay for growth.” According to
the NAHB study, growth in Norman not only pays for itself in just four years,
but also creates an operating surplus as well.
Home
building generates local economic impacts such as income and jobs for local
residents, and revenue to local governments.
It also typically imposes costs on local governments—such as providing
primary and secondary education, police and fire protection, and water and
sewer service. Not only do these
services require annual expenditures for items such as teacher salaries, they
typically also require capital investment in buildings, other structures, and
equipment that local governments own and maintain.
In the
first year of building 652 single family homes in Norman, an estimated $9.4
million in tax and other revenue for local governments was generated; $1.1
million was spent by local government to provide public services to the new
households; and $8.3 million in capital investment for new structures and
equipment was undertaken by local governments
In a
typical year after the first construction phase, the 652 single family homes
resulted in $2.9 million in tax and other revenue for local governments and
$2.1 million in local government expenditures needed to continue providing services
at current levels. The difference is an $800,000 “operating surplus.”
After 15 years,
the homes will generate a cumulative $50.1 million in revenue compared to only
$41.6 million in costs, including annual current expenses, capital investment, and
interest on debt.
The money
can then be used to advance other development projects, implement tax cuts, or
lower fees for new construction. "Homebuyers are paying their way,"
Eisenberg concludes. "The homebuilding industry is not freeloading off
existing homeowners.”
According
to Bates the economic impact study did an excellent job spelling out the
tangible economic benefits of home construction in our community.
“Naturally,
we are pleased to see the scope of the real estate development industry’s efforts
quantified,” said Bates, “but the numbers are just as significant to us as
Norman citizens.”
These
numbers show how builders and developers are major contributors to our
community. Our industry helps provide
adequate public services and education for all of our children, supports the
economic viability and marketability of our city, and helps maintain a city
where all of our families and their generations can proudly call home.”
“Every
person in the real estate development industry should be proud of what we have
heard today. Our work and livelihoods do make a difference in our community,”
added Risser.
If you have any question, please contact the Norman
Builders Association
(405)
229-9687 or trey@hallbrooke.com
Wanda Frost, NBA Executive Director
(405) 360-4161 or normanba@coxinet.net